AeroCampaign vs Constant Contact

Constant Contact was built for the newsletter. We built for the signal.

Constant Contact is a capable, approachable broadcast tool with per-contact pricing and shared sending infrastructure. AeroCampaign trades its hand-holding for two things it cannot offer: delivery through your own provider account at list price, and copy generated from each contact's behaviour.

Feature by feature

The comparison, without the asterisks

CapabilityAeroCampaignConstant Contact
Pricing basis
Their bill grows with your list whether or not you mail it.
Flat platform fee
Per contact, tiered
Cost per 1,000 emails
~$0.10 at SES cost
Bundled, marked up
Sends through your own provider
Your domain reputation is not pooled with other tenants.
Yes — SendGrid or SES
No
Own your sender reputation
Yes
Shared IP pools
AI copy per cohort
Yes
Basic assist
AI copy per individual contact
Yes
No
Industry-trend grounding
Yes
No
Billed for unsubscribed / dead contacts
The single largest line of waste on a per-contact plan.
No — cleaning bundled
Yes, counted in tier
List cleaning and dedupe included
Yes, every tier
Third-party add-on
Autonomous outbound SDR
Yes
No
Managed campaign delivery
Yes, via services partner
Limited
Cross-provider suppression
Unified, two-way sync
Platform-internal only
Bounce / complaint health thresholds
Surfaced at SES review levels
Partial
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe
Every send
Yes
Export your event stream
Full, normalized
Limited
Contact list is portable
CSV in, CSV out, always
Export available
Why teams move

Three reasons people leave Constant Contact

Delivery at provider cost

Constant Contact bundles sending into a per-contact tier. AeroCampaign charges a flat platform fee and lets you pay Amazon roughly $0.10 per 1,000 emails directly. On a large list mailed frequently, the gap is most of the bill.

Segmentation that writes itself

Building segments by hand and then writing copy for each one is the work most teams skip. The engine forms cohorts from behaviour and drafts each variant, so segmentation stops being a chore you abandon after two campaigns.

Deliverability you can actually see

A rolling 30-day bounce and complaint rate against the exact thresholds where providers place accounts under review, plus a unified suppression list synced two ways with your provider. Not a support ticket — a number on the dashboard.

The honest part

Where Constant Contact is still the better choice

Constant Contact has been shipping for two decades. Pretending otherwise would waste your time and ours.

Onboarding and support

Constant Contact's guided setup and phone support are genuinely strong, and for a small organisation without technical staff that matters more than architecture.

Events, surveys, and social

Event registration, survey tools, and social posting come bundled. AeroCampaign does email broadcasts and nothing else.

Template-first workflow

A large template library aimed at non-technical users. Our composer assumes you are comfortable with HTML or with letting the engine draft for you.

Switch if
  • You are paying for stored contacts you rarely email
  • Your list has outgrown the tier where per-contact pricing stayed reasonable
  • You want per-cohort or per-contact copy without writing every version
  • You care about owning your sender reputation and your suppression data
  • You would rather pay AWS for delivery than a platform markup
Stay if
  • You rely on the bundled event, survey, or social tooling
  • Phone support and guided onboarding are decisive for your team
  • Your list is small enough that the per-contact tier is genuinely cheap
  • No one on the team will set up a SendGrid or SES account

Try it alongside Constant Contact.

Connect a provider, import one list, and run a single campaign through the engine before you move anything else.

No credit card. Bring your own SendGrid or Amazon SES account.